linux-kernel - Re: 390/qeth: Refactoring for qeth_core_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <568A7D61.90703@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:	Mon, 4 Jan 2016 15:10:41 +0100
From:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: 390/qeth: Refactoring for qeth_core_set_online()

> In this case the function body is very small
> so I don't see any benefit at all.

Do you care for fine-tuning of variable placement occasionally?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/