[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160104161616.GP18805@8bytes.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 17:16:16 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu:Check that iommu_device_create has completed
successfully in alloc_iommu
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:10:11AM -0500, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This adds the proper check to alloc_iommu to make sure that the call
> to iommu_device_create has completed successfully and if not return
> to the caller the error code returned after freeing up resources
> allocated previously by alloc_iommu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/dmar.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> index 80e3c17..27333b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/dmar.c
> @@ -1069,9 +1069,12 @@ static int alloc_iommu(struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd)
> iommu->iommu_dev = iommu_device_create(NULL, iommu,
> intel_iommu_groups,
> "%s", iommu->name);
> + if (IS_ERR(iommu->iommu_dev)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(iommu->iommu_dev);
> + goto err_unmap;
> + }
This leaves a dangling pointer to the iommu in drhd->iommu.
>
> return 0;
> -
That blank line improves readability of the code, please leave it in.
> err_unmap:
> unmap_iommu(iommu);
> error_free_seq_id:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists