[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F39FA127B@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:20:50 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org" <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"heiko.carstens@...ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"schwidefsky@...ibm.com" <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
"mattst88@...il.com" <mattst88@...il.com>,
"ink@...assic.park.msu.ru" <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
"rth@...ddle.net" <rth@...ddle.net>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"marc.zyngier@....com" <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables
> May I humbly ask why the [Finnish] you don't use the equivalent of the
> x86 _ASM_EXTABLE() macro? In fact, why don't we make that one generic, too?
I'm messing with that right now (with help from Andy Lutomirski and Boris) to
add different classes of exception table (so I can tag some instructions as being
suitable for fixup from the machine check handler). So it might not be generic
for much longer.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=145187079504846&w=2
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists