[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160104183025.GE20016@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 11:30:25 -0700
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Wilck <Martin.Wilck@...fujitsu.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] tpm_crb: Use devm_ioremap_resource
On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 07:32:13PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:23:20AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > To support the force mode in tpm_tis we need to use resource locking
> > in tpm_crb as well, via devm_ioremap_resource.
> >
> > The light restructuring better aligns crb and tis and makes it easier
> > to see the that new changes make sense.
>
> This patch mixes two items: restructing and actual change.
Do you have a suggestion how to split this?
Everything is done for a reason, it isn't just churn for the sake of
churn.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists