linux-kernel - Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160106093239.21848a48@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:32:39 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Including Raspberry Pi -next trees in linux-next

Hi Eric,

On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 22:26:33 +0100 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 05 January 2016 13:22:49 Stephen Warren wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> branches:
> > >>> drm-vc4-next
> > >>> bcm2835-dt-next
> > >>> bcm2835-soc-next
> > >>> bcm2835-drivers-next
> > >>> bcm2385-defconfig-next
> > >>> (bcm2835-maintainers-next is a placeholder since we have nothing for it
> > >>> this round)  
> > 
> > Typically maintainers merge everything together into a single "for-next" 
> > to maintain a reasonable set of branches. I guess it doesn't affect me 
> > so my opinion isn't too relevant though:-)  
> 
> In my experience the common for-next branch works best because
> you can change the set of branches that get merged into it as
> needed. If there are 6 branches today, it's quite likely that there
> will be another one in the future and if only one branch gets
> merged into for-next, you don't need to worry about updating the list.

Certainly, that would be easier for me.  Though you may want to keep
the drm-vc4-next branch separate since that get merged via a different
tree (and can appear at a different point in my merge list).

It does mean an extra step for you i.e. you would need to merge all the
relevant branches into the single "for-next" branch, but that should
not be too big an imposition.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/