[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568B8653.2010301@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:01:07 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Roman Volkov <v1ron@...l.ru>, arm@...nel.org,
linux+armsoc@....linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>,
Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>,
Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] clocksource/vt8500: Increase the minimum delta
On 01/01/2016 02:24 PM, Roman Volkov wrote:
> From: Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>
>
> The vt8500 clocksource driver declares itself as capable to handle the
> minimum delay of 4 cycles by passing the value into
> clockevents_config_and_register(). The vt8500_timer_set_next_event()
> requires the passed cycles value to be at least 16. The impact is that
> userspace hangs in nanosleep() calls with small delay intervals.
>
> This problem is reproducible in Linux 4.2 starting from:
> c6eb3f70d448 ('hrtimer: Get rid of hrtimer softirq')
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Volkov <rvolkov@...os.org>
> Acked-by: Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>
Hi Roman,
I looked at the email thread, and IIUC if set_next_event fails, the
system freeze. Your patch fixes the issue for your driver but not the
real issue because if set_next_event fails, at least a warning should
appear in the log or better nanosleep should fail gracefully.
BTW why min delta is MIN_OSCR_DELTA * 2 in clockevents_config_and_register ?
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c
> index a92e94b..dfc3bb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/vt8500_timer.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@
>
> #define msecs_to_loops(t) (loops_per_jiffy / 1000 * HZ * t)
>
> +#define MIN_OSCR_DELTA 16
> +
> static void __iomem *regbase;
>
> static cycle_t vt8500_timer_read(struct clocksource *cs)
> @@ -80,7 +82,7 @@ static int vt8500_timer_set_next_event(unsigned long cycles,
> cpu_relax();
> writel((unsigned long)alarm, regbase + TIMER_MATCH_VAL);
>
> - if ((signed)(alarm - clocksource.read(&clocksource)) <= 16)
> + if ((signed)(alarm - clocksource.read(&clocksource)) <= MIN_OSCR_DELTA)
> return -ETIME;
>
> writel(1, regbase + TIMER_IER_VAL);
> @@ -151,7 +153,7 @@ static void __init vt8500_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
> pr_err("%s: setup_irq failed for %s\n", __func__,
> clockevent.name);
> clockevents_config_and_register(&clockevent, VT8500_TIMER_HZ,
> - 4, 0xf0000000);
> + MIN_OSCR_DELTA * 2, 0xf0000000);
> }
>
> CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(vt8500, "via,vt8500-timer", vt8500_timer_init);
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists