[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160105173835.GA23326@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 18:38:35 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...e.de, rientjes@...gle.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, oleg@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com,
andrea@...nel.org, riel@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sysrq: ensure manual invocation of the OOM killer
under OOM livelock
On Tue 05-01-16 17:22:46, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I guess this is not only sysrq+f
> specific though. What about emergency reboot or manual crash invocation?
I am a fool. For some reason I thought that em. reboot and the crash
invocation rely on the WQ as well. They are not though. So scratch this
and sorry about the confusion.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists