lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue,  5 Jan 2016 18:47:03 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>, jerry_hoemann@...com,
	yinghai@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 79/91] x86/setup: Do not reserve crashkernel high memory if low reservation failed

From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

===============

commit eb6db83d105914c246ac5875be76fd4b944833d5 upstream.

People reported that when allocating crashkernel memory using
the ",high" and ",low" syntax, there were cases where the
reservation of the high portion succeeds but the reservation of
the low portion fails.

Then kexec can load the kdump kernel successfully, but booting
the kdump kernel fails as there's no low memory.

The low memory allocation for the kdump kernel can fail on large
systems for a couple of reasons. For example, the manually
specified crashkernel low memory can be too large and thus no
adequate memblock region would be found.

Therefore, we try to reserve low memory for the crash kernel
*after* the high memory portion has been allocated. If that
fails, we free crashkernel high memory too and return. The user
can then take measures accordingly.

Tested-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
[ Massage text. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: WANG Chao <chaowang@...hat.com>
Cc: jerry_hoemann@...com
Cc: yinghai@...nel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1445246268-26285-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 3ebbd1fdc0a8..158c4751fa6c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static void __init memblock_x86_reserve_range_setup_data(void)
 # define CRASH_KERNEL_ADDR_HIGH_MAX	MAXMEM
 #endif
 
-static void __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
+static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 	const unsigned long long alignment = 16<<20;	/* 16M */
@@ -538,17 +538,16 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
 	} else {
 		/* passed with crashkernel=0,low ? */
 		if (!low_size)
-			return;
+			return 0;
 	}
 
 	low_base = memblock_find_in_range(low_size, (1ULL<<32),
 					low_size, alignment);
 
 	if (!low_base) {
-		if (!auto_set)
-			pr_info("crashkernel low reservation failed - No suitable area found.\n");
-
-		return;
+		pr_err("Cannot reserve %ldMB crashkernel low memory, please try smaller size.\n",
+		       (unsigned long)(low_size >> 20));
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
 	memblock_reserve(low_base, low_size);
@@ -560,6 +559,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
 	crashk_low_res.end   = low_base + low_size - 1;
 	insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_low_res);
 #endif
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
@@ -611,6 +611,11 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
 	}
 	memblock_reserve(crash_base, crash_size);
 
+	if (crash_base >= (1ULL << 32) && reserve_crashkernel_low()) {
+		memblock_free(crash_base, crash_size);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	printk(KERN_INFO "Reserving %ldMB of memory at %ldMB "
 			"for crashkernel (System RAM: %ldMB)\n",
 			(unsigned long)(crash_size >> 20),
@@ -620,9 +625,6 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
 	crashk_res.start = crash_base;
 	crashk_res.end   = crash_base + crash_size - 1;
 	insert_resource(&iomem_resource, &crashk_res);
-
-	if (crash_base >= (1ULL<<32))
-		reserve_crashkernel_low();
 }
 #else
 static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
-- 
2.6.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ