linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] i2c mux cleanup and locking update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160105184819.GA1743@katana>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:48:19 +0100
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Peter Rosin <peda@...ator.liu.se>
Cc:	Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Adriana Reus <adriana.reus@...el.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
	Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>,
	Olli Salonen <olli.salonen@....fi>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] i2c mux cleanup and locking update

Peter,

> PS. needs a bunch of testing, I do not have access to all the involved hw

First of all, thanks for diving into this topic and the huge effort you
apparently have put into it.

It is obviously a quite intrusive series, so it needs careful review.
TBH, I can't really tell when I have the bandwidth to do that, so I hope
other people will step up. And yes, it needs serious testing.

To all: Although I appreciate any review support, I'd think the first
thing to be done should be a very high level review - is this series
worth the huge update? Is the path chosen proper? Stuff like this. I'd
appreciate Acks or Revs for that. Stuff like fixing checkpatch warnings
and other minor stuff should come later.

Thanks,

   Wolfram

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)