lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 20:01:51 +0100 From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ator.liu.se> To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> CC: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>, Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>, Adriana Reus <adriana.reus@...el.com>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>, Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>, Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@...dl.org>, Olli Salonen <olli.salonen@....fi>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] i2c mux cleanup and locking update Hi Wolfram, On 2016-01-05 19:48, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Peter, > >> PS. needs a bunch of testing, I do not have access to all the involved hw > > First of all, thanks for diving into this topic and the huge effort you > apparently have put into it. Yeah, I started with dipping just the toes, but now it rather feels like I'm fully submerged at the deep end... > It is obviously a quite intrusive series, so it needs careful review. > TBH, I can't really tell when I have the bandwidth to do that, so I hope > other people will step up. And yes, it needs serious testing. > > To all: Although I appreciate any review support, I'd think the first > thing to be done should be a very high level review - is this series > worth the huge update? Is the path chosen proper? Stuff like this. I'd > appreciate Acks or Revs for that. Stuff like fixing checkpatch warnings > and other minor stuff should come later. Right, I'll hold back on sending updates for trivial stuff until the big picture stuff has been cleared. Cheers, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists