linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: perf test: Improbe bp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <568B4FEF.5030508@huawei.com>
Date:	Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:09:03 +0800
From:	"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To:	<will.deacon@....com>
CC:	<takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	<pi3orama@....com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: perf test: Improbe bp_signal



On 2016/1/5 12:58, Wang Nan wrote:
> Will Deacon [1] has some question on patch [2]. This patch improves
> test__bp_signal so we can test:
>
>   1. A watchpoint and a breakpoint that fire on the same instruction
>   2. Nested signals
>
> For detail of this patch see the comment in patch body.
>
> Test result:
>
>   On both x86_64:

On x86_64 and arm64.

Sorry.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/