[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1452023119-25647-58-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 11:42:45 -0800
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 057/211] ACPI: Using correct irq when waiting for events
4.2.8-ckt1 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
commit efb1cf7d28b8aeacec53e9ba8f3f2809c5cb9686 upstream.
When the system is waiting for GPE/fixed event handler to finish,
it uses acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt directly as the IRQ number.
However, the remapped IRQ returned by acpi_gsi_to_irq() should be
passed to synchronize_hardirq() instead of it.
Acked-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
drivers/acpi/osl.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 9323096..9d5436f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -1213,8 +1213,8 @@ void acpi_os_wait_events_complete(void)
* Make sure the GPE handler or the fixed event handler is not used
* on another CPU after removal.
*/
- if (acpi_irq_handler)
- synchronize_hardirq(acpi_gbl_FADT.sci_interrupt);
+ if (acpi_sci_irq_valid())
+ synchronize_hardirq(acpi_sci_irq);
flush_workqueue(kacpid_wq);
flush_workqueue(kacpi_notify_wq);
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists