linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] printk: Hand over printing to console if printing too long

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160106083653.GA10678@swordfish>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 17:36:53 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>,
	KY Sri nivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] printk: Hand over printing to console if printing
 too long

On (01/06/16 12:38), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (01/05/16 15:48), Jan Kara wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > > cond_resched() does its job there, of course. well, a user process still can
> > > > do a lot of call_console_drivers() calls. may be we can check who is calling
> > > > console_unlock() and if we have "!printk_sync && !oops_in_progress" (or just printk_sync
> > > > test) AND a user process then return from console_unlock() doing irq_work_queue()
> > > > and set PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT pending bit, the way vprintk_emit() does it.
> > > 
> > > attached two patches, I ended up having on top of yours. just in case.
> > > 
> > >     printk: factor out can_printk_async()
> > >     
> > >     console_unlock() can be called directly or indirectly by a user
> > >     space process, so it can end up doing call_console_drivers() loop,
> > >     which will hold it from returning back to user-space from a syscall
> > >     for unpredictable amount of time.
> > >     
> > >     Factor out can_printk_async() function, which queues an irq work and
> > >     sets a PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT pending bit (if we can do async printk).
> > >     vprintk_emit() already does it, add can_printk_async() call to
> > >     console_unlock() for !PF_KTHREAD processes.
> > 
> > I'd be cautious about changing this userspace visible behavior. Someone may
> > be relying on it... I agree that sometimes we can block userspace process
> > in kernel for a long time (e.g. in my testing I often see syslog process
> > doing the printing) but so far I didn't see / was notified about some real
> > problem with this. So unless I see some real user issues with user
> > processes doing printing for too long I would not touch this.
> 
> and w/o a lot of effort (no heavy printk message traffic)

or like this on another setup ([k|u]_ts updated to u64)

# cat /proc/1/time_in_console_unlock
kern:[12.755920] user:[38.367332]

	-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/