[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1452076655-12851-100-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:37:08 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 099/126] af_unix: Revert 'lock_interruptible' in stream receive code
3.16.7-ckt22 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>
commit 3822b5c2fc62e3de8a0f33806ff279fb7df92432 upstream.
With b3ca9b02b00704053a38bfe4c31dbbb9c13595d0, the AF_UNIX SOCK_STREAM
receive code was changed from using mutex_lock(&u->readlock) to
mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock) to prevent signals from being
delayed for an indefinite time if a thread sleeping on the mutex
happened to be selected for handling the signal. But this was never a
problem with the stream receive code (as opposed to its datagram
counterpart) as that never went to sleep waiting for new messages with the
mutex held and thus, wouldn't cause secondary readers to block on the
mutex waiting for the sleeping primary reader. As the interruptible
locking makes the code more complicated in exchange for no benefit,
change it back to using mutex_lock.
Signed-off-by: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
[ luis: backported to 3.16: adjusted context ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
net/unix/af_unix.c | 13 +++----------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
index 9acfd79f0d13..7229794c1419 100644
--- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
+++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
@@ -2096,14 +2096,7 @@ static int unix_stream_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
memset(&tmp_scm, 0, sizeof(tmp_scm));
}
- err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock);
- if (unlikely(err)) {
- /* recvmsg() in non blocking mode is supposed to return -EAGAIN
- * sk_rcvtimeo is not honored by mutex_lock_interruptible()
- */
- err = noblock ? -EAGAIN : -ERESTARTSYS;
- goto out;
- }
+ mutex_lock(&u->readlock);
if (flags & MSG_PEEK)
skip = sk_peek_offset(sk, flags);
@@ -2144,12 +2137,12 @@ again:
timeo = unix_stream_data_wait(sk, timeo, last);
- if (signal_pending(current)
- || mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->readlock)) {
+ if (signal_pending(current)) {
err = sock_intr_errno(timeo);
goto out;
}
+ mutex_lock(&u->readlock);
continue;
unlock:
unix_state_unlock(sk);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists