[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1452076655-12851-42-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:36:10 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 041/126] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats
3.16.7-ckt22 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
commit b4fe85f9c9146f60457e9512fb6055e69e6a7a65 upstream.
Drivers like vxlan use the recently introduced
udp_tunnel_xmit_skb/udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb APIs. udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb
makes use of ip6tunnel_xmit, and ip6tunnel_xmit, after sending the
packet, updates the struct stats using the usual
u64_stats_update_begin/end calls on this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats).
udp_tunnel_xmit_skb makes use of iptunnel_xmit, which doesn't touch
tstats, so drivers like vxlan, immediately after, call
iptunnel_xmit_stats, which does the same thing - calls
u64_stats_update_begin/end on this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats).
While vxlan is probably fine (I don't know?), calling a similar function
from, say, an unbound workqueue, on a fully preemptable kernel causes
real issues:
[ 188.434537] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: kworker/u8:0/6
[ 188.435579] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
[ 188.435583] CPU: 0 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 4.2.6 #2
[ 188.435607] Call Trace:
[ 188.435611] [<ffffffff8234e936>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[ 188.435615] [<ffffffff81915f3d>] check_preemption_disabled+0x19d/0x1c0
[ 188.435619] [<ffffffff81915f77>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
The solution would be to protect the whole
this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats)/u64_stats_update_begin/end blocks with
disabling preemption and then reenabling it.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
include/net/ip6_tunnel.h | 3 ++-
include/net/ip_tunnels.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h b/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h
index a5593dab6af7..ef9557683fec 100644
--- a/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h
+++ b/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h
@@ -79,11 +79,12 @@ static inline void ip6tunnel_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
err = ip6_local_out(skb);
if (net_xmit_eval(err) == 0) {
- struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats);
+ struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = get_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats);
u64_stats_update_begin(&tstats->syncp);
tstats->tx_bytes += pkt_len;
tstats->tx_packets++;
u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp);
+ put_cpu_ptr(tstats);
} else {
stats->tx_errors++;
stats->tx_aborted_errors++;
diff --git a/include/net/ip_tunnels.h b/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
index 8dd8cab88b87..6d953cc9b351 100644
--- a/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
+++ b/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
@@ -166,12 +166,13 @@ static inline void iptunnel_xmit_stats(int err,
struct pcpu_sw_netstats __percpu *stats)
{
if (err > 0) {
- struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = this_cpu_ptr(stats);
+ struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = get_cpu_ptr(stats);
u64_stats_update_begin(&tstats->syncp);
tstats->tx_bytes += err;
tstats->tx_packets++;
u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp);
+ put_cpu_ptr(tstats);
} else if (err < 0) {
err_stats->tx_errors++;
err_stats->tx_aborted_errors++;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists