linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the nfsd tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 07:27:25 -0500
From:	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
	Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the nfsd tree


> On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jan 4, 2016, at 2:36 PM, J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:53:20PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
>>> On 01/03/2016 08:44 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:30:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Doug,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in a quite a
>>>>> few files between (mostly, I think) commit:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 6c7b6d2d442c ("IB: merge struct ib_device_attr into struct ib_device")
>>>>> 
>>>>> from the nfsd tree and various commits from the rdma tree.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It would have taken me considerable time to fix the conflicts up, so I
>>>>> have dropped teh rdma tree for today (just because it was merged second).
>>>>> Please have a conversation and figure out how you are going to cooperate
>>>>> and get these conflicts fixed e.g. set up a stable branch with Christoph's
>>>>> commit (and any other conflicting commits) in it and merge that into
>>>>> both trees.
>>>> 
>>>> So, on further inspection, it appears that there is a series of commits
>>>> in the rdma tree that does basically the same as that nfsd tree commit
>>>> above.  So I have dropped the rdma tree again today.  Please have a
>>>> conversation guys ...
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> The initial patchset was Christoph's.  It was later replaced with a
>>> different patchset from Or Gerlitz.  Bruce picked up some changes from
>>> Chuck Lever that were originally based on Christoph's work but now need
>>> to be rebased off of the current RDMA tree.
>> 
>> OK.  I'm assuming Chuck will want to do any necessary rebasing and
>> retesting himself, so for now I've just dropped those patches, and
>> expect to pick up new versions when Chuck gets back from the holidays.
> 
> Part of the plan was that Doug's tree would be merged before
> Bruce's. But the above problem description looks like the
> maintainer trees were merged into linux-next in the other order.
> 
> I'd like to make this simpler for everyone. Bruce, may I send
> my for-4.5 NFS/RDMA server patches to Doug with your Acked-by?
> That way, merge order won't matter.

Also, I see Dan Carpenter has posted a couple of clean-ups for
this series. I can include them with my upcoming repost if you
wish.

--
Chuck Lever




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/