linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: factor work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:47:53 +0000
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	cmetcalf@...hip.com, will.deacon@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...capital.net,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: factor work_pending state machine to C

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:30:11PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:33:35PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Currently ret_fast_syscall, work_pending, and ret_to_user form an ad-hoc
> > state machine that can be difficult to reason about due to duplicated
> > code and a large number of branch targets.
> > 
> > This patch factors the common logic out into the existing
> > do_notify_resume function, converting the code to C in the process,
> > making the code more legible.
> > 
> > This patch tries to mirror the existing behaviour as closely as possible
> > while using the usual C control flow primitives. There should be no
> > functional change as a result of this patch.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...hip.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> 
> This is definitely cleaner. The only downside is slightly more expensive
> ret_fast_syscall. I guess it's not noticeable (though we could do some
> quick benchmark like getpid in a loop). Anyway, I'm fine with the patch:
> 
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>

Cheers!

While any additional overhead hasn't been noticeable, I'll try to get
some numbers out as part of the larger deasm testing/benchmarking.

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/