[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <90E07B04-AAFD-45E9-85EA-44C659191180@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:24:13 -0500
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the nfsd tree
> On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:15 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:01:14AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> Part of the plan was that Doug's tree would be merged before
>> Bruce's. But the above problem description looks like the
>> maintainer trees were merged into linux-next in the other order.
>>
>> I'd like to make this simpler for everyone. Bruce, may I send
>> my for-4.5 NFS/RDMA server patches to Doug with your Acked-by?
>> That way, merge order won't matter.
>>
>> Doug, what is the URL for the branch I should rebase on?
>
> I'm not Doug, but all the recent for 4.5 work is in Dougs tree
> at
>
> https://github.com/dledford/linux rdma/k.o/for-4.5
>
> Bruce, can you ACK me local_dma_lkey patch as well which needs
> the same treatment as Chuck's patches? I have some RDMA work
> in that area planned for the nxt merge window, so it would be
> really helpful to get it in for 4.5.
Actually, one of Or's for-4.5 devattr patches doesn't
appear to have the proper Ack's for the changes under
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma either.
--
Chuck Lever
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists