[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160106153601.GA25632@imap.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:36:01 +0100
From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@...gle.com>
To: Peter Stuge <peter@...ge.se>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add support for usbfs zerocopy.
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:22:12PM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
>>> Our interface for zero copy reads/writes is O_DIRECT, and that requires
>>> not special memory allocation, just proper alignment.
>> But that assumes you are using I/O using read()/write(). There's no way you
>> can shoehorn USB isochronous reads into the read() interface, O_DIRECT or not.
> How about aio?
I don't really see how; a USB device does not look much like a file. (Where
would you stick the endpoint, for one? And how would you ever submit an URB
with multiple packets in it, which is essential?) It feels a bit like
trying to use UDP sockets with only read() and write().
In any case, the usbfs interface already exists and is stable. This is about
extending it; replacing it with something new from scratch to get zerocopy
would seem overkill.
/* Steinar */
--
Software Engineer, Google Switzerland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists