[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160106162517.GA13070@fieldses.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:25:17 -0500
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the nfsd tree
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:01:14AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
> Part of the plan was that Doug's tree would be merged before
> Bruce's. But the above problem description looks like the
> maintainer trees were merged into linux-next in the other order.
The order makes no difference.
The problem is that we had conflicting patches: I still had Christoph's
patch, but Doug's tree did something different.
(The only reason to care about merge order is that if I sent my pull
request to Linus first, it would look like "here's the nfsd changes for
4.5. Oh, plus a bunch of rdma changes from Doug which he can explain
later...". So it'd be best if the rdma changes were already in before I
sent a pull request based on them.)
> I'd like to make this simpler for everyone. Bruce, may I send
> my for-4.5 NFS/RDMA server patches to Doug with your Acked-by?
Sure, I'm fine with doing it either way. Feel free to add my Acked-by:
to the patches you sent me before if that would simplify things.
--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists