linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160106162830.GZ6588@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:28:30 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
	galak@...eaurora.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: max8973: add support for junction thermal
 warning

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 08:25:21AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:37:35PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > I tried to roundoff to the next higher threshold when supported value (120
> > > or 140 degC) is not provided in driver. But it is fine to me to specify the
> > > possible value setting here and DT binding doc. Will do on next patch.

> > I don't really mind which you use so long as the documentation is clear.

> I prefer that degrees are used rather than register values.

The downside of that is that it does mean more validation code.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)