linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g1dGC2YMN+JZPKhzbCm8PQJ7nJqV4JGjJ3w1PAf12v+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 6 Jan 2016 08:37:21 -0800
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
	"Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] x86, mce: Add __mcsafe_copy()

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>> You were heading towards:
>>
>> ld: undefined __mcsafe_copy
>
> True, we'd also need a dummy mcsafe_copy() definition to compile it
> out in the disabled case.
>
>> since that is also inside the #ifdef.
>>
>> Weren't you going to "select" this?
>>
>
> I do select it, but by randconfig I still need to handle the
> CONFIG_X86_MCE=n case.
>
>> I'm seriously wondering whether the ifdef still makes sense. Now I don't have an extra exception table and routines to sort/search/fixup, it doesn't seem as useful as it was a few iterations ago.
>
> Either way is ok with me.  That said, the extra definitions to allow
> it compile out when not enabled don't seem too onerous.

This works for me, because all we need is the definitions.  As long as
we don't attempt to link to mcsafe_copy() we get the benefit of
compiling this out when de-selected:


diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
index 16a8f0e56e4a..5b24039463a4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/string_64.h
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ int strcmp(const char *cs, const char *ct);
#define memset(s, c, n) __memset(s, c, n)
#endif

-#ifdef CONFIG_MCE_KERNEL_RECOVERY
struct mcsafe_ret {
       u64 trapnr;
       u64 remain;
@@ -86,7 +85,6 @@ struct mcsafe_ret {

struct mcsafe_ret __mcsafe_copy(void *dst, const void __user *src, size_t cnt);
extern void __mcsafe_copy_end(void);
-#endif

#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/