[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx7_sP_R+n6c3Ew=KVcwJwwgXhB57pSG9Kh24oiAqd+vw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 09:48:31 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, elliott@....com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] x86: Add classes to exception tables
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Luck, Tony <tony.luck@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Linus, Peter, Ingo, Thomas: Can we head this direction? The code is cleaner
> and more flexible. Or should we stick with Andy's clever way to squeeze a
> couple of "class" bits into the fixup field of the exception table?
I'd rather not be clever in order to save just a tiny amount of space
in the exception table, which isn't really criticial for anybody.
So I think Borislav's patch has the advantage of being pretty
straightforward and allowing arbitrary fixups, in case we end up
having localized special cases..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists