[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-724697648eec540b2a7561089b1c87cb33e6a0eb@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 10:51:28 -0800
From: tip-bot for Andi Kleen <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jolsa@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
acme@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, vincent.weaver@...ne.edu,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86: Use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for cycles:
ppp
Commit-ID: 724697648eec540b2a7561089b1c87cb33e6a0eb
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/724697648eec540b2a7561089b1c87cb33e6a0eb
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 03:50:52 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:15:32 +0100
perf/x86: Use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for cycles: ppp
Add a new 'three-p' precise level, that uses INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST as
base. The basic mechanism of abusing the inverse cmask to get all
cycles works the same as before.
PREC_DIST is available on Sandy Bridge or later. It had some problems
on Sandy Bridge, so we only use it on IvyBridge and later. I tested it
on Broadwell and Skylake.
PREC_DIST has special support for avoiding shadow effects, which can
give better results compare to UOPS_RETIRED. The drawback is that
PREC_DIST can only schedule on counter 1, but that is ok for cycle
sampling, as there is normally no need to do multiple cycle sampling
runs in parallel. It is still possible to run perf top in parallel, as
that doesn't use precise mode. Also of course the multiplexing can
still allow parallel operation.
:pp stays with the previous event.
Example:
Sample a loop with 10 sqrt with old cycles:pp
0.14 │10: sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0 <--------------
9.13 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
11.58 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
11.51 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
6.27 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.38 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
12.20 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
12.74 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
5.40 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.14 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.51 │ ↑ jmp 10
We expect all 10 sqrt to get roughly the sample number of samples.
But you can see that the instruction directly after the JMP is
systematically underestimated in the result, due to sampling shadow
effects.
With the new PREC_DIST based sampling this problem is gone and all
instructions show up roughly evenly:
9.51 │10: sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
11.74 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
11.84 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
6.05 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.46 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
12.25 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
12.18 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
5.26 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.13 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
10.43 │ sqrtps %xmm1,%xmm0
0.16 │ ↑ jmp 10
Even with PREC_DIST there is still sampling skid and the result is not
completely even, but systematic shadow effects are significantly
reduced.
The improvements are mainly expected to make a difference in high IPC
code. With low IPC it should be similar.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: hpa@...or.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1448929689-13771-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 3 ++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h | 3 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 6 ++++
4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 9dfbba5..e7e63a9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -482,6 +482,9 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
/* Support for IP fixup */
if (x86_pmu.lbr_nr || x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 2)
precise++;
+
+ if (x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist)
+ precise++;
}
if (event->attr.precise_ip > precise)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index 799e6bd..ce8768f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -583,7 +583,8 @@ struct x86_pmu {
bts_active :1,
pebs :1,
pebs_active :1,
- pebs_broken :1;
+ pebs_broken :1,
+ pebs_prec_dist :1;
int pebs_record_size;
void (*drain_pebs)(struct pt_regs *regs);
struct event_constraint *pebs_constraints;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 5ed6e0d..762c602 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2475,6 +2475,44 @@ static void intel_pebs_aliases_snb(struct perf_event *event)
}
}
+static void intel_pebs_aliases_precdist(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ if ((event->hw.config & X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK) == 0x003c) {
+ /*
+ * Use an alternative encoding for CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD_P
+ * (0x003c) so that we can use it with PEBS.
+ *
+ * The regular CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.THREAD_P event (0x003c) isn't
+ * PEBS capable. However we can use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST
+ * (0x01c0), which is a PEBS capable event, to get the same
+ * count.
+ *
+ * The PREC_DIST event has special support to minimize sample
+ * shadowing effects. One drawback is that it can be
+ * only programmed on counter 1, but that seems like an
+ * acceptable trade off.
+ */
+ u64 alt_config = X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01, .inv=1, .cmask=16);
+
+ alt_config |= (event->hw.config & ~X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK);
+ event->hw.config = alt_config;
+ }
+}
+
+static void intel_pebs_aliases_ivb(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ if (event->attr.precise_ip < 3)
+ return intel_pebs_aliases_snb(event);
+ return intel_pebs_aliases_precdist(event);
+}
+
+static void intel_pebs_aliases_skl(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ if (event->attr.precise_ip < 3)
+ return intel_pebs_aliases_core2(event);
+ return intel_pebs_aliases_precdist(event);
+}
+
static unsigned long intel_pmu_free_running_flags(struct perf_event *event)
{
unsigned long flags = x86_pmu.free_running_flags;
@@ -3431,7 +3469,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_ivb_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_ivb_pebs_event_constraints;
- x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_snb;
+ x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_ivb;
+ x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist = true;
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 62)
x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snbep_extra_regs;
else
@@ -3464,7 +3503,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_hsw_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_hsw_pebs_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snbep_extra_regs;
- x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_snb;
+ x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_ivb;
+ x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist = true;
/* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1;
x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_NO_HT_SHARING;
@@ -3499,7 +3539,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_bdw_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_hsw_pebs_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snbep_extra_regs;
- x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_snb;
+ x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_ivb;
+ x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist = true;
/* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1;
x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_NO_HT_SHARING;
@@ -3521,7 +3562,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_skl_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_skl_pebs_event_constraints;
x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_skl_extra_regs;
- x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_core2;
+ x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_skl;
+ x86_pmu.pebs_prec_dist = true;
/* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_HAS_RSP_1;
x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_NO_HT_SHARING;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
index 56b5015..9c0f8d4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
@@ -686,6 +686,8 @@ struct event_constraint intel_ivb_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
INTEL_PST_CONSTRAINT(0x02cd, 0x8), /* MEM_TRANS_RETIRED.PRECISE_STORES */
/* UOPS_RETIRED.ALL, inv=1, cmask=16 (cycles:p). */
INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x108001c2, 0xf),
+ /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST, inv=1, cmask=16 (cycles:ppp). */
+ INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x108001c0, 0x2),
INTEL_EXCLEVT_CONSTRAINT(0xd0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOP_RETIRED.* */
INTEL_EXCLEVT_CONSTRAINT(0xd1, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_UOPS_RETIRED.* */
INTEL_EXCLEVT_CONSTRAINT(0xd2, 0xf), /* MEM_LOAD_UOPS_LLC_HIT_RETIRED.* */
@@ -700,6 +702,8 @@ struct event_constraint intel_hsw_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
INTEL_PLD_CONSTRAINT(0x01cd, 0xf), /* MEM_TRANS_RETIRED.* */
/* UOPS_RETIRED.ALL, inv=1, cmask=16 (cycles:p). */
INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x108001c2, 0xf),
+ /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST, inv=1, cmask=16 (cycles:ppp). */
+ INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x108001c0, 0x2),
INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT_DATALA_NA(0x01c2, 0xf), /* UOPS_RETIRED.ALL */
INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT_DATALA_XLD(0x11d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.STLB_MISS_LOADS */
INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT_DATALA_XLD(0x21d0, 0xf), /* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.LOCK_LOADS */
@@ -718,6 +722,8 @@ struct event_constraint intel_hsw_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
struct event_constraint intel_skl_pebs_event_constraints[] = {
INTEL_FLAGS_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x1c0, 0x2), /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST */
+ /* INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST, inv=1, cmask=16 (cycles:ppp). */
+ INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x108001c0, 0x2),
/* INST_RETIRED.TOTAL_CYCLES_PS (inv=1, cmask=16) (cycles:p). */
INTEL_FLAGS_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x108000c0, 0x0f),
INTEL_PLD_CONSTRAINT(0x1cd, 0xf), /* MEM_TRANS_RETIRED.* */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists