[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4h3NcXHHQAWL=HwgGxTbFTeOa98S9fxWu7dA3nTEcFxxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 11:14:09 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, XFS Developers <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] dax: fix NULL pointer dereference in __dax_dbg()
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Ross Zwisler
<ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> __dax_dbg() currently assumes that bh->b_bdev is non-NULL, passing it into
> bdevname() where is is dereferenced. This assumption isn't always true -
> when called for reads of holes, ext4_dax_mmap_get_block() returns a buffer
> head where bh->b_bdev is never set. I hit this BUG while testing the DAX
> PMD fault path.
>
> Instead, verify that we have a valid bh->b_bdev, else just say "unknown"
> for the block device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> ---
> fs/dax.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
> index 7af8797..03cc4a3 100644
> --- a/fs/dax.c
> +++ b/fs/dax.c
> @@ -563,7 +563,12 @@ static void __dax_dbg(struct buffer_head *bh, unsigned long address,
> {
> if (bh) {
> char bname[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
> - bdevname(bh->b_bdev, bname);
> +
> + if (bh->b_bdev)
> + bdevname(bh->b_bdev, bname);
> + else
> + snprintf(bname, BDEVNAME_SIZE, "unknown");
> +
> pr_debug("%s: %s addr: %lx dev %s state %lx start %lld "
> "length %zd fallback: %s\n", fn, current->comm,
> address, bname, bh->b_state, (u64)bh->b_blocknr,
I'm assuming there's no danger of a such a buffer_head ever being used
for the bdev parameter to dax_map_atomic()? Shouldn't we also/instead
go fix ext4 to not send partially filled buffer_heads?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists