[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160106225016.2e730dd3@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 22:50:16 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "Qiu, PeiyangX" <peiyangx.qiu@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: correct start_index in find_next
On Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:56:56 +0800
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> How is this patch? It fixes a kernel panic.
>
Linus already pulled it. It's also marked for stable. See commit:
f36d1be2930ede0a1947686e1126ffda5d5ee1bb in Linus's tree.
I renamed the subject slightly to:
"tracing: Fix setting of start_index in find_next()"
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists