[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568E20DF.6090402@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 09:25:03 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/s390: drop unpaired smp_mb
On 01/05/2016 05:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> smp_mb on vcpu destroy isn't paired with anything, violating pairing
> rules, and seems to be useless.
>
> Drop it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Applied.
(I had to fix this up a little to match kvm/next)
Thanks
> ---
>
> Untested.
>
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 8465892..7305d2c 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -1195,7 +1195,6 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> (__u64) vcpu->arch.sie_block)
> vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->cpu[vcpu->vcpu_id].sda = 0;
> }
> - smp_mb();
>
> if (kvm_is_ucontrol(vcpu->kvm))
> gmap_free(vcpu->arch.gmap);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists