[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568E38CB.3010604@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:07:07 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] KVM: use list_for_each_entry_safe
On 01/01/2016 12:47, Geliang Tang wrote:
> Use list_for_each_entry_safe() instead of list_for_each_safe() to
> simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@....com>
> ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 9 +++------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 484079e..5b6df4f 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -630,13 +630,10 @@ void *kvm_kvzalloc(unsigned long size)
>
> static void kvm_destroy_devices(struct kvm *kvm)
> {
> - struct list_head *node, *tmp;
> + struct kvm_device *dev, *tmp;
>
> - list_for_each_safe(node, tmp, &kvm->devices) {
> - struct kvm_device *dev =
> - list_entry(node, struct kvm_device, vm_node);
> -
> - list_del(node);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &kvm->devices, vm_node) {
> + list_del(&dev->vm_node);
> dev->ops->destroy(dev);
> }
> }
>
These patches will be considered for 4.6. Thanks!
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists