[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1452170339-26748-2-git-send-email-wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 20:38:56 +0800
From: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <tj@...nel.org>, <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
<peter.huangpeng@...wei.com>,
wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/4] workqueue: move the wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf allocation location.
the wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf will be useful, only when the
wq_numa_enabled is true.
if there is something wrong to cause the wq_numa_enable false, it
can just return without the wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf
allocation.
This doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: wanghaibin <wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index c579dba..d6cbe3d 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5180,9 +5180,6 @@ static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
return;
}
- wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf = alloc_workqueue_attrs(GFP_KERNEL);
- BUG_ON(!wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf);
-
/*
* We want masks of possible CPUs of each node which isn't readily
* available. Build one from cpu_to_node() which should have been
@@ -5207,6 +5204,9 @@ static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
wq_numa_possible_cpumask = tbl;
wq_numa_enabled = true;
+
+ wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf = alloc_workqueue_attrs(GFP_KERNEL);
+ BUG_ON(!wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf);
}
static int __init init_workqueues(void)
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists