[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568E74C4.5000407@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 15:23:00 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@....ntt.co.jp>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Reorganize request bits
On 01/07/2016 03:17 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> There is no need for request bits to differ across architectures. Only
> a handful of them are architecture-independent, the others can all share
> bits 8-31 with overlap.
>
> Leaving room for more architecture-independent bits means that actually
> no bits are freed, but the cleanup is useful anyway IMO.
>
> Paolo Bonzini (4):
> KVM: Remove unused KVM_REQ_KICK to save a bit in
> KVM: document which architecture uses each request bit
> KVM: renumber architecture-dependent requests
> KVM: move architecture-dependent requests to arch/
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 10 ++++++++++
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 39 +++++--------------------------------
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 10 ----------
> 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
For the idea:
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
but no deep review so far.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists