linux-kernel - Re: int overflow in io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACT4Y+bD6NXGf6Ry+9rP5mKWbQ1sWb2O-+8HuyRmiK+-gVJTtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 7 Jan 2016 16:37:43 +0100
From:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-aio <linux-aio@...ck.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>
Subject: Re: int overflow in io_getevents

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:12:02AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> ...
>> Sorry, but the following program still prints -9223372036562067969. I
>> think timespec_valid check will do.
>
> Ah, right.  Yes, using timespec_valid() instead of  timespec_valid_strict()
> as initially proposed will address my concerns.  Updated commit below.
>
>                 -ben
> --
> "Thought is the essence of where you are now."
>
> commit 3a55c535cf3836257434518bd6bc11464c493492
> Author: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
> Date:   Thu Jan 7 10:25:44 2016 -0500
>
>     aio: handle integer overflow in io_getevents() timespec usage
>
>     Dmitry Vyukov reported an integer overflow in io_getevents() when
>     running a fuzzer.  Upon investigation, the triggers appears to be that
>     an invalid value for the tv_sec or tv_nsec was passed in which is not
>     handled by timespec_to_ktime().  This patch fixes that by making
>     io_getevents() return -EINVAL when timespec_valid() checks fail.  We
>     use timespec_valid() instead of timespec_valid_strict() to avoid issues
>     caused by userspace not knowing the cutoff for KTIME_SEC_MAX.
>
>     Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
>     Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
>
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index 155f842..d161a2f 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -1269,6 +1269,8 @@ static long read_events(struct kioctx *ctx, long min_nr, long nr,
>
>                 if (unlikely(copy_from_user(&ts, timeout, sizeof(ts))))
>                         return -EFAULT;
> +               if (!timespec_valid())

pass ts to the function

> +                       return -EINVAL;
>
>                 until = timespec_to_ktime(ts);
>         }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/