[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1452185424.4776.36.camel@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:50:24 +0100
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Zheng Yang <zhengyang@...k-chips.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] drm: rockchip: hdmi: add RK3229 HDMI support
Hi Yakir,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.01.2016, 18:15 +0800 schrieb Yakir Yang:
> Hi Philipp,
>
> Thanks for your fast respond :)
>
> On 01/07/2016 06:04 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 07.01.2016, 17:02 +0800 schrieb Yakir Yang:
> >> RK3229 integrate an DesignedWare HDMI2.0 controller and an INNO HDMI2.0 phy,
> >> the max output resolution is 4K.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
> > It sounds like the INNO HDMI2.0 phy is not necessarily specific to
> > RK3229 but might also appear in other SoCs? If so, I think this should
> > be implemented in a separate phy driver and be used by dw_hdmi-rockchip.
>
> Do you mean I should create a new phy driver that place in "driver/phy"
> directly ?
Possibly, yes. The exynos video phys are already there. I have kept the
mediatek dsi/hdmi phys together with the DRM driver, but I suppose I
could move them there, too.
> I have think about this idea, and it would make things much clean. But
> INNO PHY
> driver need the target pixel clock in drm_display_mode, I didn't find a
> good way
> to pass this variable to separate phy driver. Do you have some idea ?
We'd need to extend the PHY API for this. For the mediatek phys we have
side-stepped the issue by wiring up the PLL output to the common clock
framework.
I expect besides the pixel clock frequency, it might also be necessary
to inform the PHY about cycles per pixel for deep color modes.
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists