lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 07 Jan 2016 17:50:24 +0100
From:	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
To:	Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
Cc:	Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	Andy Yan <andy.yan@...k-chips.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Zheng Yang <zhengyang@...k-chips.com>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] drm: rockchip: hdmi: add RK3229 HDMI support

Hi Yakir,

Am Donnerstag, den 07.01.2016, 18:15 +0800 schrieb Yakir Yang:
> Hi Philipp,
> 
> Thanks for your fast respond :)
> 
> On 01/07/2016 06:04 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, den 07.01.2016, 17:02 +0800 schrieb Yakir Yang:
> >> RK3229 integrate an DesignedWare HDMI2.0 controller and an INNO HDMI2.0 phy,
> >> the max output resolution is 4K.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
> > It sounds like the INNO HDMI2.0 phy is not necessarily specific to
> > RK3229 but might also appear in other SoCs? If so, I think this should
> > be implemented in a separate phy driver and be used by dw_hdmi-rockchip.
> 
> Do you mean I should create a new phy driver that place in "driver/phy" 
> directly ?

Possibly, yes. The exynos video phys are already there. I have kept the
mediatek dsi/hdmi phys together with the DRM driver, but I suppose I
could move them there, too.

> I have think about this idea, and it would make things much clean. But 
> INNO PHY
> driver need the target pixel clock in drm_display_mode, I didn't find a 
> good way
> to pass this variable to separate phy driver. Do you have some idea ?

We'd need to extend the PHY API for this. For the mediatek phys we have
side-stepped the issue by wiring up the PLL output to the common clock
framework.
I expect besides the pixel clock frequency, it might also be necessary
to inform the PHY about cycles per pixel for deep color modes.

regards
Philipp

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists