linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv1 2/6] IB/core: Added members to support rdma cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG53R5XXqkd1Xk-dQxEACc+RB_rdiwhT0bbn5GK5Aek5=9=EtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2016 01:10:59 +0530
From:	Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	lizefan@...wei.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
	Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>,
	"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
	Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
	serge@...lyn.com, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
	Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>, raindel@...lanox.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 2/6] IB/core: Added members to support rdma cgroup

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:37 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:46:19AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 12:28:02AM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
>> >> Added function pointer table to store resource pool specific
>> >> operation for each resource type (verb and hw).
>> >> Added list node to link device to rdma cgroup so that it can
>> >> participate in resource accounting and limit configuration.
>> >
>> > Is there any point in splitting patches 1 and 2 from 3?
>> >
>> Patch 2 is in IB stack, so I separated that patch out from 1. That
>> makes it 3 patches.
>> If you think single patch is easier to review, let me know, I can
>> respin to have one patch for these 3 smaller patches.
>
> They don't do anything by themselves.  I think putting them into a
> single patch would be easier to review.

o.k. I will put them in single patch.

>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun