[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG53R5WVJoO1Dd9vJ+zeiskQsttSbOpW+uyfay-oJFELd-FK2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 02:31:26 +0530
From: Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
lizefan@...wei.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>,
"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
serge@...lyn.com, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>, raindel@...lanox.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 0/6] rdma controller support
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Ooh, btw, please don't bother to create separate interfaces for v1 and
> v2 hierarchies. Just creating one following v2 conventions and using
> the same thing for v1 should do and is a lot easier for everybody.
>
Sure. I have already made that change to remove list.
and changed rdma.resource.verb.limit to rdma.verb.max etc.
I will keep rdma.hw.max around until we get some consensus.
Alternatively I was thinking to merge that as another attribute in
rdma.max file, like
mlx4_0 verb ah=max pd=10 qp=10
mlx4_0 hw ah=10 pd=100
ocrdma hw ah=10 pd=100
This remove hw specific extra file for rare feature.
Parav
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists