[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOGi=dP1VZUmPOS=by-c0v-HMjdXRqp_0iRfk82_8vq4nO2xcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 07:01:09 +0800
From: Ling Ma <ling.ma.program@...il.com>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@....com>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Ling <ling.ml@...baba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] alispinlock: acceleration from lock integration on
multi-core platform
> The claim in the original post is 3x performance but doesn't explain
> performance doing what, or which kernel locks were switched and what
> patches were used. I don't find the numbers hard to believe for a big big
> box, but I'd like to see the actual use case patches so it can be benched
> with other workloads and also for latency and the like.
>
We have sent out in email, please review and test it.
Thanks
Ling
Powered by blists - more mailing lists