[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160108090846.GA746@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:08:46 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...erainc.com>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Andy Grover <agrover@...hat.com>,
Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@...ux.intel.com>, Vu Pham <vu@...lanox.com>,
Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@...gic.com>,
Giridhar Malavali <giridhar.malavali@...gic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] target: Obtain se_node_acl->acl_kref during
get_initiator_node_acl
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:47:39AM -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Actually no, they do not. That's the way that everything outside of
> tcm_fc + ib_srpt driver code has already worked for a long time.
Another reason to introduce a helper to enforce that ordering!
Everything but iscsi and qla2xxx is absolutely trivial to convert.
qla2xxx needs some work, but I think it's actually wrong currently
as it sets the s_id and loop_id unconditionally even if we're
reusing an existing node ACL. iscsi is black magic as usual, so I'm
a little lost..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists