linux-kernel - Re: x86/microcode update on systems without INITRD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1601081029210.12000@er-systems.de>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:33:48 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>
To:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
cc:	Thomas Voegtle <tv@...96.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86/microcode update on systems without INITRD

On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:

> On 2016.01.07 at 13:36 +0100, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
>> On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 01:12:16PM +0100, Thomas Voegtle wrote:
>>>> I just diffed my 4.3 config with the 4.4 config and saw that the whole
>>>> Microcode stuff was silently dropped by a normal "make oldconfig".
>>>
>>> Can you send me that 4.3 config please?
>>
>> Attached. It is a little bit unusual config without modules etc.
>>
>> But doesn't dropping Microcde stuff in the config happen to anyone who
>> hasn't INITRD stuff switched on?
>
> Yes. But, as I wrote above, if you simply drop the BLK_DEV_INITRD
> dependency, it will work just fine.


That's not an option for me.

For me this is a serious regression, when a normal make oldconfig silently 
drops a feature which I had switched on before.



   Thomas