[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160108112142.GF13058@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:21:42 +0100
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
srv_heupstream@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: Allow changing PLL rate when it is off
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 05:48:53PM +0800, James Liao wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 10:15 +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:16:37PM +0800, James Liao wrote:
> > > Some modules may need to change its clock rate before turn on it.
> > > So changing PLL's rate when it is off should be allowed.
> > > This patch removes PLL enabled check before set rate, so that
> > > PLLs can set new frequency even if they are off.
> >
> > This sounds like the software refused to change the rate on disabled
> > PLLs, but this is not the case.
>
> In fact the major change of this patch is trigger (set) CON0_PCW_CHG no
> matter PLL is on or not.
>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c | 9 ++-------
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> > > index 966cab1..8e31fae 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-pll.c
> > > @@ -91,9 +91,6 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw,
> > > int postdiv)
> > > {
> > > u32 con1, val;
> > > - int pll_en;
> > > -
> > > - pll_en = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON0) & CON0_BASE_EN;
> > >
> > > /* set postdiv */
> > > val = readl(pll->pd_addr);
> > > @@ -114,15 +111,13 @@ static void mtk_pll_set_rate_regs(struct mtk_clk_pll *pll, u32 pcw,
> > >
> > > con1 = readl(pll->base_addr + REG_CON1);
> > >
> > > - if (pll_en)
> > > - con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG;
> > > + con1 |= CON0_PCW_CHG;
> >
> > This bit is described as "Feedback divide ratio update". To me this
> > sounds like we have to inform the hardware that the PLL registers have
> > been updated. The current code only sets this bit when the PLL is
> > enabled which sounds sane to me.
> >
> > >
> > > writel(con1, pll->base_addr + REG_CON1);
> > > if (pll->tuner_addr)
> > > writel(con1 + 1, pll->tuner_addr);
> > >
> > > - if (pll_en)
> > > - udelay(20);
> > > + udelay(20);
> >
> > We seem to have to wait here until the PLL is really running at the new
> > frequency. Normally we don't have to do this when the PLL is disabled.
> >
> > I'm sure this patch solves a real problem, from looking at it it's just
> > not clear to me what the problem is. Could you clarify this a bit?
>
> On MT8173 for example, ARMPLL's enable bit can be controlled by other
> HW. That means ARMPLL may be turned on even if we (CPU / SW) set
> ARMPLL's enable bit as 0. In this case, SW may want and can still change
> ARMPLL's rate by changing its pcw and postdiv settings. But without this
> patch, new pcw setting will not be applied because its enable bit is 0.
Ok, thanks for explaining. Could you add that to the commit message?
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists