[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160108010200.GB4503@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:02:00 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc: "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [char-misc-next RESEND 0/6] mei updates
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:32:20PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:56:34PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:46:33PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > > > I've sent those patches ~ two months ago but were probably dropped from
> > > > > the queue so resending them again.
> > > >
> > > > sorry, they are still in there, it's been a busy few months, I'll get to
> > > > these for the next release, it's too late for this one, my fault.
> > >
> > > Can you be specific what is next release, the merging window is still not open...
> >
> > The "merge window" is for subsystem maintainers to merge to Linus, I
> > have to have my tree "closed" for a week before that for linux-next to
> > settle down. It's been this way for a very long time.
>
> Understood, I've just paid attention that the parport patches was
> applied last few days so I've also tried my luck Anyhow please
> reconsider ' mei: fix fasync return value on error' which was
> originally indented for 4.4-rc5 and should go to the stable.
the parport ones were tiny code style issues. I'll go look at this
fasync patch now...
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists