lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568FB964.7030705@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:28:04 +0800
From:	Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
To:	Minfei Huang <mhuang@...hat.com>
Cc:	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kexec: Provide
 arch_kexec_protect(unprotect)_crashkres()

On 01/08/2016 at 04:47 PM, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 01/08/16 at 10:33am, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>> +
>> +static int
>> +kexec_mark_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool protect)
>> +{
>> +	struct page *page;
>> +	unsigned int nr_pages;
>> +
>> +	/* For physical range: [start, end] */
>> +	if (!end || start > end)
>> +		return 0;
> This test !end is hard to be understood without the annotation. It is
> better to add the comment about it.

!end is just for uninitialized crashk resource with a zero end member,
maybe not so hard to understand :-)

Regards,
Xunlei

>
> Otherwise it looks good for me.
>
> Thanks
> Minfei
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ