[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <568FB964.7030705@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 21:28:04 +0800
From: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...hat.com>
To: Minfei Huang <mhuang@...hat.com>
Cc: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] kexec: Provide
arch_kexec_protect(unprotect)_crashkres()
On 01/08/2016 at 04:47 PM, Minfei Huang wrote:
> On 01/08/16 at 10:33am, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>> +
>> +static int
>> +kexec_mark_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool protect)
>> +{
>> + struct page *page;
>> + unsigned int nr_pages;
>> +
>> + /* For physical range: [start, end] */
>> + if (!end || start > end)
>> + return 0;
> This test !end is hard to be understood without the annotation. It is
> better to add the comment about it.
!end is just for uninitialized crashk resource with a zero end member,
maybe not so hard to understand :-)
Regards,
Xunlei
>
> Otherwise it looks good for me.
>
> Thanks
> Minfei
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
Powered by blists - more mailing lists