[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160108155203.GA28533@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:52:03 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] perf: bpf: Fix build breakage due to libbpf
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 06:23:03PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 05:39:57PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 12:28:15PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao escreveu:
> > > Can you please push at least the initial 3 patches of this for v4.4?
> > > Wang Nan has posted v6 here:
> > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2110626
>
> > So I tried it again today, from the v6, the latest patch with that
> > subject line in my inbox, and I get this, after applying the first three
> > patches:
>
> > [acme@zoo linux]$ make -C tools clean > /dev/null
> > [acme@zoo linux]$ make -C tools/perf build-test
> > make: Entering directory '/home/git/linux/tools/perf'
> > Testing Makefile
> > tests/make:15: /scripts/Makefile.arch: No such file or directory
> > make[2]: *** No rule to make target '/scripts/Makefile.arch'. Stop.
> > tests/make:5: recipe for target 'all' failed
> > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> > Makefile:81: recipe for target 'build-test' failed
> > make: *** [build-test] Error 2
> > make: Leaving directory '/home/git/linux/tools/perf'
> > [acme@zoo linux]$
>
> > Trying to figure this out...
>
> So, this doesn't seem to have been tessted, this part, specifically:
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/make b/tools/perf/tests/make
> index 8ea3dffc5065..cd9c3ce1a5c2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/make
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/make
> @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ endif
> else
> PERF := .
>
> -include config/Makefile.arch
> +include $(srctree)/scripts/Makefile.arch
>
> # FIXME looks like x86 is the only arch running tests ;-)
> # we need some IS_(32/64) flag to make this generic
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Because $(srctree) is not set at that point, I copied the needed bits from
> tools/perf/Makefile.perf and got the patch below, which makes:L
>
> make -C tools/perf build-test
>
> Work for me again.
>
> This should wrap up the day nicely, making me think of Jens Axboe recent
> cool reaction to an untested patch:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5661C2BC.9030007@kernel.dk
>
> :-)
>
> Jiri, are you ok with the patch below, on top of the second patch in
> Wang's series, that you acked?
yep, looks good to me
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists