[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160108020743.GA118336@google.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 18:07:43 -0800
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Ian Munsie <imunsie@....ibm.com>
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: Build failure: -Wno-unused-const-variable DNE on old GCC
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:31:54PM +1100, Ian Munsie wrote:
> Excerpts from Brian Norris's message of 2016-01-08 10:02:25 +1100:
> > > - It forces cxl developers to a higher standard. cxl has already had
> > > more than it's fair share of incredibly difficult to debug issues,
> > > so any way we can reduce the risk of errors going in makes our lives
> > > (and our end-users lives) better.
> >
> > One problem with this point: not all warnings are under the purview of
> > cxl developers. For instance, if I turn up warning verbosity (W=1), then
(BTW, I think most of these files are currently clean with W=1, but not
W=2)
> > the *header* files start producing plenty of warnings. Should this break
> > the build? Your code didn't change, and you can't fix those errors.
>
> That's a good point, but the specific warnings that we suppressed in the
> new compiler are in drivers/misc/cxl/cxl.h, which is an internal header
> that should only ever be included by the cxl driver. We do have some
> headers elsewhere which are included by other drivers, the generic ppc
> architecture code and userspace, but these are all warning free and
> won't be affected by the -Werror when included from elsewhere.
I was referring to when extra warnings are turned on, not just the
default. So this fails spectacularly:
$ export ARCH=powerpc
$ make ppc64_defconfig
$ make drivers/misc/cxl/api.o W=2
CC [M] drivers/misc/cxl/api.o
In file included from include/linux/bitops.h:36:0,
from include/linux/kernel.h:10,
from include/linux/list.h:8,
from include/linux/pci.h:25,
from drivers/misc/cxl/api.c:10:
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h:226:94: error: declaration of 'ffs' shadows a built-in function [-Werror=shadow]
In file included from include/linux/atomic.h:562:0,
from include/linux/mutex.h:18,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:13,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:15,
from include/linux/kobject.h:21,
from include/linux/pci.h:28,
from drivers/misc/cxl/api.c:10:
include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h: In function 'atomic_long_read_acquire':
include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:45:231: error: nested extern declaration of '__compiletime_assert_45' [-Werror=nested-externs]
In file included from include/linux/atomic.h:562:0,
from include/linux/mutex.h:18,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:13,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:15,
from include/linux/kobject.h:21,
from include/linux/pci.h:28,
from drivers/misc/cxl/api.c:10:
include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h: In function 'atomic_long_set_release':
include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:57:1: error: nested extern declaration of '__compiletime_assert_57' [-Werror=nested-externs]
In file included from include/linux/ktime.h:25:0,
from include/linux/rcupdate.h:47,
from include/linux/idr.h:18,
from include/linux/kernfs.h:14,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:15,
from include/linux/kobject.h:21,
from include/linux/pci.h:28,
from drivers/misc/cxl/api.c:10:
include/linux/jiffies.h: In function 'jiffies_to_timespec':
include/linux/jiffies.h:422:131: error: declaration of 'jiffies' shadows a global declaration [-Werror=shadow]
include/linux/jiffies.h:78:65: error: shadowed declaration is here [-Werror=shadow]
In file included from include/linux/kernfs.h:16:0,
from include/linux/sysfs.h:15,
from include/linux/kobject.h:21,
from include/linux/pci.h:28,
from drivers/misc/cxl/api.c:10:
[...many more failures...]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[1]: *** [drivers/misc/cxl/api.o] Error 1
make: *** [drivers/misc/cxl/api.o] Error 2
I doubt you plan to fix all those. So making -Werror configurable seems like
the only way forward, then. (Glad you agreed!)
Regards,
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists