[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160108185120.GQ109450@google.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:51:20 -0800
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
Neelesh Gupta <neelegup@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: bcm47xxsflash: use devm_ioremap_nocache() instead
of KSEG0ADDR()
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:01:00PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
> > > This removes some (implicit) MIPS dependencies and makes the code more
> > > portable, whether we need it or not :)
> >
> > So now we have following forwardtrace:
> > devm_ioremap_nocache
> > ioremap_nocache
> > __ioremap_mode
> > __ioremap
> > CKSEG1ADDR
I just noticed that ioremap() and ioremap_nocache() are the same on
MIPS. So I could just do devm_ioremap_resource() and save myself a few
lines...
> > It results in different address than KSEG0ADDR:
> > [ 1.339752] [bcm47xxsflash_bcma_probe] KSEG0ADDR(BCMA_SOC_FLASH2):9c000000
> > [ 1.346848] [bcm47xxsflash_bcma_probe] devm_ioremap_nocache:bc000000
> >
> > But it still works as expected! :)
> > [ 1.609426] 6 bcm47xxpart partitions found on MTD device bcm47xxsflash
> > [ 1.616169] Creating 6 MTD partitions on "bcm47xxsflash":
>
> It is a functional change though and I think the change from a cached to
> uncached mapping (i.e. from `ioremap' to `ioremap_nocache') has to be a
> separate patch, so that both changes can be reviewed independently.
As I noted before sending my patch, I don't think this driver should
have been using KSEG0 anyway; it should have been KSEG1, right? I can
note that in the patch description, but I don't really see why it needs
to be a separate patch.
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists