linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: Fix a bug in the error handling function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BY2PR0301MB1654D797E802F3CF5355942FA0F60@BY2PR0301MB1654.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2016 18:58:20 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"ohering@...e.com" <ohering@...e.com>,
	"jbottomley@...allels.com" <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
	"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
	"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
	"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	"hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>
CC:	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: Fix a bug in the error
 handling function



> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 3:49 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org; ohering@...e.com;
> jbottomley@...allels.com; hch@...radead.org; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org;
> apw@...onical.com; vkuznets@...hat.com; jasowang@...hat.com;
> martin.petersen@...cle.com; hare@...e.de
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: Fix a bug in the error
> handling function
> 
> On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 16:40 -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > The macro startget_to_rport() can return NULL; handle that case
> > properly.
> 
> OK, can we unwind why you think you could possibly need this?  It would
> mean that fc_timed_out was called for a non-FC device, which was
> thought to be an impossibility when the fc transport class was
> designed.

As you know, on Hyper-V, FC devices are handled exactly like normal scsi
devices and the only additional information that is provided for FC devices
is the WWN for port and node. Till recently, I was not publishing the WWN in
the guest and so I was not even using the FC transport. Recently, I implemented
support for publishing the WWN in the guest and for that I am using the FC transport
for FC hosts. When an FC LUN is dynamically removed, sometimes I see the timeout
occurring and since there is no rport associated with these devices I am hitting the issue
this patch is addressing. I could have addressed this problem by establishing a storvsc specific
time out function even for FC devices - the same timeout function that I currently use for scsi
devices -  storvsc_eh_timed_out(). I chose to instead fix the fc_timed_out() function since
the code was not handling a possible condition.

Regards,

K. Y
> 
> James
> 
> > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> > b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> > index 24eaaf6..42a908f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
> > @@ -2081,7 +2081,7 @@ fc_timed_out(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> >  {
> >  	struct fc_rport *rport = starget_to_rport(scsi_target(scmd
> > ->device));
> >
> > -	if (rport->port_state == FC_PORTSTATE_BLOCKED)
> > +	if ((rport == NULL) || (rport->port_state ==
> > FC_PORTSTATE_BLOCKED))
> >  		return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
> >
> >  	return BLK_EH_NOT_HANDLED;