lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 8 Jan 2016 20:31:18 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/31] x86, pkeys: arch-specific protection bits

On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Dave Hansen wrote:

> 
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Lots of things seem to do:
> 
>         vma->vm_page_prot = vm_get_page_prot(flags);
> 
> and the ptes get created right from things we pull out
> of ->vm_page_prot.  So it is very convenient if we can
> store the protection key in flags and vm_page_prot, just
> like the existing permission bits (_PAGE_RW/PRESENT).  It
> greatly reduces the amount of plumbing and arch-specific
> hacking we have to do in generic code.
> 
> This also takes the new PROT_PKEY{0,1,2,3} flags and
> turns *those* in to VM_ flags for vma->vm_flags.
> 
> The protection key values are stored in 4 places:
> 	1. "prot" argument to system calls
> 	2. vma->vm_flags, filled from the mmap "prot"
> 	3. vma->vm_page prot, filled from vma->vm_flags
> 	4. the PTE itself.
> 
> The pseudocode for these for steps are as follows:
> 
> 	mmap(PROT_PKEY*)
> 	vma->vm_flags 	  = ... | arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(mmap_prot);
> 	vma->vm_page_prot = ... | arch_vm_get_page_prot(vma->vm_flags);
> 	pte = pfn | vma->vm_page_prot
> 
> Note that this provides a new definitions for x86:
> 
> 	arch_vm_get_page_prot()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ