linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: atmel: get rid of struct mci_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vdq83QRUw_ZxxVWcC6Xut5y-sJfYwLA+cOtGMhjB7Rm3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 9 Jan 2016 14:10:27 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
Cc:	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: atmel: get rid of struct mci_dma_data

On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 3:22 AM, Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com> wrote:
> As struct mci_dma_data is now only used by AVR32, it is nothing but
> pointless indirection.  Replace it with struct dw_dma_slave in the
> AVR32 platform code and with a void pointer elsewhere.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>

> @@ -1376,15 +1375,15 @@ at32_add_device_mci(unsigned int id, struct mci_platform_data *data)
>                                 ARRAY_SIZE(atmel_mci0_resource)))
>                 goto fail;
>
> -       slave = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mci_dma_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       slave = kzalloc(sizeof(*slave), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!slave)
>                 goto fail;
>
> -       slave->sdata.dma_dev = &dw_dmac0_device.dev;
> -       slave->sdata.src_id = 0;
> -       slave->sdata.dst_id = 1;
> -       slave->sdata.m_master = 1;
> -       slave->sdata.p_master = 0;

Seems you based this on top of our non-submitted yet patches.

> +       slave->dma_dev = &dw_dmac0_device.dev;
> +       slave->src_id = 0;
> +       slave->dst_id = 1;
> +       slave->m_master = 1;
> +       slave->p_master = 0;


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko