[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJKOXPdie=mAPFxdnn_Ue+kNVTKQ1bFJigti35JMz7hmkYJ9cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:46:12 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable s5p-secss driver
2016-01-09 0:35 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>:
> Hello Krzysztof,
>
> On 01/06/2016 11:15 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The Exynos SoC provides a Security SubSystem block for accelerating some
>> cryptographic operations. Enable the driver for it - s5p-secss to
>> utilize the hardware acceleration.
>>
>> Currently the s5p-secss driver supports AES in CBC and ECB modes.
>> However on Odroid XU4 (Exynos5422) and Trats2 (Exynos4412) boards this
>> change introduces one booting error:
>>
>> alg: skcipher: encryption failed on chunk test 1 for ecb-aes-s5p: ret=22
>>
>> The cbc-aes-s5p properly registers itself and passes self-tests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
>> index 0aee1e035be9..c47c7e069873 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/exynos_defconfig
>> @@ -240,6 +240,7 @@ CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES=y
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES=y
>> CONFIG_DEBUG_USER=y
>> +CONFIG_CRYPTO_DEV_S5P=y
>
> I noticed that this is not enabled in multi_v7_defconfig.
> Are you planing to do it as well?
Thanks for feedback and review. I noticed that as well but I am not
convinced because one of two of supported algorithms fails the
tests... which makes 50% of driver non-working. :) Maybe it is
harmless - just pollutes the dmesg... Maybe after fixing it.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists