[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160109070819.GA4516@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 07:08:19 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 12 PID: 16862 at
./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:236
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 07:48:04PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Yes, sigsuspend() should do "while (!signal_pending(current))". Like
> sys_pause() does, -ERESTARTNOHAND without signal_pending() is equally
> wrong.
>
> I'll send the fix unless Sasha wants to do this.
Looks like neither mainline nor -next has that...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists