[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160109080426.GA6207@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 00:04:26 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: mchristi@...hat.com
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
philipp.reisner@...bit.com, lars.ellenberg@...bit.com,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
target-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
osd-dev@...n-osd.org, xfs@....sgi.com, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/35] block: add QUEUE_FLAGs for flush and fua
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 02:53:37PM -0600, mchristi@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>
>
> The last patch added a REQ_OP_FLUSH for request_fn drivers
> and the next patch renames REQ_FLUSH to REQ_PREFLUSH which
> will be used by file systems and make_request_fn drivers.
>
> This leaves REQ_FLUSH/REQ_FUA defined for drivers to tell
> the block layer if flush/fua is supported. The names are
> confusing and I bet will will accidentally be used by
> people to request flushes. To avoid that, this patch adds
> QUEUE_FLAGs for flush and fua which drivers will use to
> indicate what they support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>
Yes, this was rather confusing before. Looks great fix the fix for th
kbuild complaint:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists