linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] net: tc35815: Fix build error due to missed API change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5691C695.1080703@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Sat, 9 Jan 2016 18:48:53 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] net: tc35815: Fix build error due to missed API
 change

On 01/09/2016 02:09 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Hi Guenter
>>>
>>> You fix looks right, but i'm wondering about the code which is being
>>> fixed.
>>>
>>> How can phydev ever evaluate to true, given the break statement?  Can
>>> this code every detect multiple PHYs? I think not.
>>>
>>> Either the break needs to be removed, or we just replace the whole lot
>>> with phy_find_first().
>>>
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> you are right, the current code is pretty pointless.
>>
>> I would suggest to use phy_find_first().
>
> Me too.
>
>> Should I submit a separate patch, or replace my patch with v2 ?
>
> I say a v2 which uses phy_find_first() and include in the changelog
> why the current code is pointless and so the change to
> phy_find_first().
>

Ok, I'll do that.

Guenter